Among those who call themselves socialists, two kinds of persons may be distinguished. They are, in the first place, those who plan for a new order of society, in which private and individual competition are to be superseded and other motives to action substituted, are on the scale of a village community of township, and would be applied to an entire country by the multiplication of such self-acting units; of this character are the systems of Owen, of Fourier, and the more thoughtful and philosophic socialists generally. The other class, which is more a product of the continent than of Great Britain and may be called the revolutionary socialists, has people who propose to themselves a much bolder stroke. Their scheme is the management of the whole productive resources of the country by one central authority, the general government. And with this view some of them avow as their purpose that the working classes, or somebody on their behalf, should take possession of all the property of the country, and administer it for the general benefit.
Whatever may be the difficulties of the first of these two forms of socialism, the second may evidently involve the same difficulties and many more. The former, too has the great advantage that it can be brought into operation progressively, and can prove its capabilities by trial. It can be tried first on a select population and extended to the rest as their education and cultivation permit. It need not, and the natural order of things would not, become an engine of subversion until it has shown itself capable of being also a mean of reconstruction. It is not so with the other: the aim of that is to substitute the new rule for the old at a single stroke, and to exchange the amount of good realized under the present system, and its large possibilities for a plunge without any preparation into the most extreme form of the problem of carrying on the whole round of the operations of social life without the motive power which has always hitherto worked the social machinery. It must be acknowledged that those who would play this game on the strength of their own private opinion, unconfirmed as yet by any experimental verification-who would forcibly deprive all who have now a comfortable physical existence of their only present means of preserving it, and would brave the frightful bloodshed and misery that would ensue if the attempt was resisted-must have a serene confidence in their own wisdom on one hand and the recklessness of other peoples’ suffering on the other, of which, Robespierre and St. Just, were hitherto the typical instances. Nevertheless, this scheme has great elements of popularity which the more cautious and reasonable form of socialism has not; because what it professes to do, it promises to do quickly and holds out hope to the enthusiasts of seeing the whole of their aspirations realised in their own time and at a blow.
Question 1
|
Who among of the following is not a socialist?
A
|
Robespierre
|
B
|
Fourier
|
C
|
Owen
|
D
|
All are socialists
|
Explanation: According to the passage, all of the
above have been mentioned as socialists. Hence, option D is the right choice
|
Question 2
|
Which of the following, according to the author, is true?
A
|
The second form of socialism
has more difficulties that the first
|
B
|
The second form of socialism has the same difficulties as
the first
|
C
|
The second form of socialism has less difficulties than
the first
|
D
|
The author has not compared the difficulties of the two
Explanation : Refer to the line from paragraph
2...,”Whatever may be the difficulties of the first of these two forms of
socialism, the second must evidently involve the same difficulties and many
more” which explains that option A is the right answer choice
|
Question 3
|
According to the author, the difference between the two
kinds of socialists is that
A
|
one consists of thinkers and the others are active people
|
B
|
the first have a definite philosophy and the second don’t
have any definite philosophy
|
C
|
the first believe in gradual
change while the others believe in revolutionary change
|
D
|
the first are the products of Britain, while the other are
products of Russia
|
Explanation: The
answer to this question can be found in paragraph 1 of the passage. It
explains that the first believe in gradual change while the others believe in
revolutionary change. Option C is the right choice
|
Question 4
|
Which of the following were characteristics of St. Just and
Robespierre?
A
|
Unconcern for other’s suffering
|
B
|
Full confidence in their own wisdom
|
C
|
Both 1 and 2
|
D
|
Neither 1 nor 2
|
Explanation: According to the passage, both
have been mentioned as the characteristics of the two. Option C is the right
answer. Refer to the lines: It must be acknowledged that those who would play
this game on the strength of their own private opinion, unconfirmed as yet by
any experimental verification-who would forcibly deprive all who have now a
comfortable physical existence of their only present means of preserving it,
and would brave the frightful bloodshed and misery that would ensue if the
attempt was resisted-must have a serene confidence in their own wisdom on one
hand and the recklessness of other peoples’ suffering on the other, of which,
Roberspierre and St. Just, were hitherto the typical instances.
|
Question 5
|
Which of the following according to the author, may not be
the result of not verifying the desirability of socialism experimentally first?
A
|
Bloodshed
|
B
|
Deprivation of current comfortable existence
|
C
|
Corruption in high places
|
D
|
Misery caused by resisting the change
|
Explanation: This is another easy
question. Option C does not find a mention in the passage
|
Question 6
|
According to the philosophy of revolutionary socialism,
A
|
the government takes over the villages first, and then
gradually the whole country.
|
B
|
The government takes over all
productive resources of the country at one stroke.
|
C
|
The government declares a police state and rules by
decree.
|
D
|
There is no government as such: the people rule themselves
by the socialist doctrine.
|
Explanation: It is directly given in the
passage that the aum of revolutionary socialism is to take over everything
and then things in one go. This makes option B the correct answer.
|
Question 7
|
The word 'avow' in the context of the passage means
A
|
proclaim
|
B
|
vow
|
C
|
affirm
|
D
|
deny
|
Explanation: Avow means 'To declare or affirm
solemnly and formally as true'. Proclaim means "Declare formally;
declare someone to be something; of titles'.
|
Question 8
|
It may be inferred from the passage that the author's
sympathies are for
A
|
Neither side.
|
B
|
The side of the socialist doctrine.
|
C
|
The second type of socialism.
|
D
|
The first type of socialism.
|
Explanation: The author does not exhibit
sympathies for any one side in particular. He adopts a descriptive approach
in the passage.
|
